(31) The arguer overemphasizes the importance of …

(32) The conclusion reached in this argument is invalid and probably misleading.

(33) The evidence provided in this argument is not sufficient to validate the assumption that …

(34) The statistical evidence/ the result of the survey upon which the argument relies is too vague to be in formative.

(35) The result of the study is incomplete to be conclusive.

(36) The argument relies on figures that are too imprecise to support the conclusion drawn.

(37) If the subjects for the study were randomly chosen and represent a diverse cross section of the population of …, the results will be reliable regardless of …

(38) Since the arguer makes a claim about … in general, the sample for the survey should be able to represent all …

(39) Yet we are told nothing about the way the poll was conducted and how well it represented the public opinions.

(40) The example cited, is insufficient to warrant their truth because there is no reason to believe that the data drawn from … is representative of …

(41) The arguer assumes that what is true of a group as a whole is necessarily true of each member of that group.

(42) The argument assumes that what is true of group of people taken collectively is also true of any individual within that group.

(43) The argument attributes a characteristic of an individual member of a group to group as a whole.

(44) The arguer support the conclusion by over — generalizing from a specific piece of evidence.

(45) The arguer draws a hasty conclusion which is based on inadequate evidence about …

(46) The arguer generalizes on the basis of a sample consisting of atypical cases.

(47) The arguer use a few exceptional case as the basis for a claim about what is true in general.

(48) The arguer draws a conclusion that is broader in scope than is warranted by the evidence advanced.

(50) The author generalizes from what is true in one region of space to what must be true in all regions of space.